New York Probate Court

August 24, 2011

New York Estate Planning Timing Good With Market Bad

A recent Wall Street Journal article reports that now is a good time to consider planning an estate in New York and elsewhere, given the volatility of the economy.

With interest rates low and Congress increasing the federal gift-tax exemption to $5 million from $1 million for people until the end of 2012, there are some advantages to planning your future now.Putting together a will and other estate plans is a critical step too often delayed. No one wants to plan out their death, but the reality is that it is a necessary step for adulthood. Especially those with children; consultation with an experienced New York Probate Lawyer is a must. Estate planning is as much for the peace of mind of the person as it is for the time and energy it saves the relatives and friends who may be inheriting assets.

Not planning an estate can cause greed and frustration to lead to arguments and fighting; sometimes, tragically, the rift becomes irreparable. And for those with minor children, a lack of estate planning can leave the kids without clear direction of where they will live and how they will be cared for. The Wall Street Journal article hits on the current economy market and how this may be a good time to take the steps to planning out an estate.

Discounts:

Those who have large amounts of stocks in private companies can give away the stock at a big discount. Regardless of the market’s typical ups and downs, an investor usually gets a discount when giving away some stock in a business that doesn’t trade publicly.

In normal times, the Internal Revenue Service allows a 30 to 35 percent discount because it may be harder for the company to find a buyer. But with the stock market so volatile lately, owners of private stock can argue for a bigger discount.

With the stock market up several hundred points one day and down several hundred the next, the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index has reached in the 40s. The index measures the expected volatility of the S&P 500 over 30 days. Stock owners may be able to argue for discounts in the 45 to 65 percent range.

GRATs:

A grantor-retained annuity trust allows a person to give an asset to a trust, but also retain rights to annuitized payments over a certain time frame. For people with battered stock of publicly traded companies, you are really giving away future appreciation tax free.

If the stocks do well, a GRAT allows a person to transfer the upside to children or a trust without paying a gift tax. The gift-tax exemption is $5 million, but will go to $1 million after 2012. However, assets put into a GRAT must appreciate more than the IRS’s “hurdle rate,” which is 2.2 percent a year.

If the assets don’t hit that hurdle, they go back to the original owner or the GRAT can be “reset” and transferred to a new GRAT. A GRAT can be as short as a two-year period.

Loans:

With low interest rates, loans to fund an investment can be beneficial right now. If a loan is taken out by a trust, the children can use the money to buy stock or depressed real estate at a low price and could pay back the loan and still reap the benefits of the investment now.

August 17, 2011

In Death, Amy Winehouse Appears Clever After Smart Will and Estate Planning

by Jules M. Haas

Most would agree that the recent death of 27-year-old singer Amy Winehouse was tragic. Winehouse continually battled drug and alcohol addiction as her music made millions — including a song called “Rehab.”

But she got her will right MSN Money reports. It leads a New York Estate Planning Lawyer to believe this is a perfect example of why people of any age must consider putting together a will. These types of plans do not just apply to people who are older, but people of any age, regardless of financial status. In order to make sure your assets go to the people you want, a New York will must be prepared.According to the article, Winehouse’s revised will reportedly prevents any of her fortune — about $16 million — from going to her ex-husband. Instead, the money will go to her father, mother and older brother.

Under English law, a divorce doesn’t undo the presumption that the natural inheritor is the spouse. Without a will, in England, divorcees would inherit assets. However, in New York, Estates, Powers and Trusts Law section 5-1.2 disqualifies a spouse from inheriting if the parties were divorced. Under New York intestate laws, a person’s spouse and children typically inherit assets. Thus, people who may have a poor relationship with the decedent may benefit, while others who were close to the person may receive nothing. It’s best not to leave these issues up to the state. Setting up a clearly laid out will can avoid any confusion and can make sure the person’s desires are carried out after death.

Preparing a New York estate plan involves many considerations particularly in the case of a divorce. While the New York statutes and a valid Last Will may exclude a divorced spouse, other assets that have designated beneficiaries should also be reviewed and revised. These include retirement funds and jointly owned interests. An example of the problems caused by incomplete planning were displayed recently in the case of an attorney who divorced his wife and had named her as the beneficiary of his Individual Retirement Account during their marriage. As reported in insurancenewsnet.com on August 2, 2011, following the divorce the attorney never removed his ex-wife’s name as the beneficiary of his IRA. Ultimately, the account was paid to the ex-wife. Adding insult to injury, the IRA contained proceeds from another retirement account that was rolled over into it.

According to an AARP poll, more than one third of Americans over 50 lack a will, living trust or power of attorney. Most people consider death a long, down-the-road event. But as we see every day, death can happen at any time. It is critical to put plans in place to make sure finances are in order after death.

MSN calls parents of minor children “negligent” if they don’t have these documents in place. While people don’t want to plan their own demise, setting up a will saves the children from a potentially ugly child custody battle as well as providing guidance concerning the manner in which the children are to be taken care of after the parent’s death.

While do-it-yourself estate planning web sites exist, the MSN article points out that they include outdated information, lack of customization and too little flexibility. They also leave out certain topics, such as creating a special needs trust.

The bottom line is that estate planning requires some effort, but people lack motivation to accomplish this simple step in their lives, thinking they won’t need to do it for a while. We are a nation of procrastinators in this regard. But you can save your family members a lot of stress and frustration by establishing a will or trust now, before it’s too late.

August 12, 2011

New York Executors Have Fiduciary Responsibilities and Are Subject to Court Review

by Jules M. Haas

The New York estate settlement process involves many different requirements and responsibilities. An Executor is the person or institution appointed by the Surrogate’s Court to administer or carry out the terms or provisions in a Last Will. The responsibilities of a person named as Executor begins immediately after the death of the decedent.

An Executor’s first duty is to file the Will with the Court and prepare a petition for probate. The Court must officially appoint the Executor before he or she has authority to handle estate affairs. While information provided in the probate petition is the same whether filed in Nassau, Suffolk or Queens counties, it may not always be easy to provide the required data. Among the items needed to be completed is a list of the names and addresses of all of the decedent’s distributees (i.e., next of kin). While this may be a simple task where a decedent is survived by a spouse and/or children, the information may not be so easy to provide where the decedent’s closest relatives are cousins and spread out throughout many different countries.

In a number of estates where I represented the Executor, distributees numbered in the twenties and many lived overseas. Also, particular problems arise when the decedent was orphaned or estranged from his or her family at a young age.

The named Executor is often faced with kinship issues such as these. Also, the potential for a Will Contest always exists. Thus, the Executor’s obligations can be quite extensive and complex even before the actual administration of the estate begins.

Once the Executor is actually appointed by the Court, it is his or her job to collect the decedent’s assets; pay bills, taxes and claims; and distribute the estate assets to the estate beneficiaries. In some instances, the Will may name more than one person as Executor and disputes may arise between the Executors. In a recent case decided by Surrogate Edward W. McCarty on June 2, 2011 and reported in the New York Law Journal on June 20, 2011, one of the Executors interfered with the sale of the decedent’s
residence. This conduct prompted the other Executor to commence a Court proceeding pursuant to Surrogate’s Court Procedure Action section 719 for removal of the Executor.

Even routine matters may pose extraordinary problems. As noted above, one duty of an Executor as a fiduciary is to determine and satisfy a decedent’s debts or the claims against the estate. An Executor who improperly performs this task may end up personally responsible for payment. However, determining the extent and validity of a claim or debt can be difficult. As reported by Letitia Stein on July 27, 2011 in the St. Petersburg Times, a lawsuit was filed against the estate of a woman by a hospital which claimed the deceased woman incurred over 9 million dollars in medical expenses prior to her death.

Determining and paying estate taxes or estate income taxes is also a complex matter. Just this past year Executors and other fiduciaries were required to examine the new tax laws very closely to determine whether an option concerning the cost basis of estate assets or utilizing an increased estate tax exemption would be most beneficial.

Distributing estate assets to beneficiaries can also have many problems. Quite often, beneficiaries are minors and payment must be made to a Trust or to a Guardian appointed by the Court. Also, beneficiaries may not agree with the calculations utilized in computing their shares or may object to some action taken or not taken by the Executor. A contested accounting proceeding may result from these disputes. Additionally, a beneficiary may die before receiving his or her distribution and a proper estate fiduciary must be appointed for the beneficiary’s estate before his or her share can be paid out.

The many responsibilities and issues faced by Executors and other estate fiduciaries in administering an estate are endless. Having an experienced estate settlement attorney is important to advise the fiduciary concerning these matters in estate administration

August 9, 2011

Estate Litigation Can Complicate and Delay Settlement of Decedent’s Estates

by Jules M. Haas

Attorneys familiar with probating a Last Will throughout New York, such as in the Bronx and Brooklyn, are often confronted with issues that result in Court litigation. Many of these controversies involve family disputes and disagreements that have origins many years before the death of the decedent. Once a person dies, opportunities are presented to activate long held disagreements and family disharmony.

It is not uncommon for a testator to prepare a Will and disinherit a child or other close relative. New York law does not require that a person leave anything to a child. However, as previously discussed in the New York Probate Lawyer Blog, Estates, Powers and Trusts Law section 5-1-1-A requires that a portion of an estate be left to a spouse.

After being disinherited, a disgruntled child can use the requirements of the probate process to Contest a Will. In his or her view, the testator’s Will should be deemed invalid because lack of capacity or undue influence was the cause of the disinheritance and not the personal disharmony that existed for many years. Since the decedent is no longer around to express his or her desires, it is now up to the Court and the litigants to sort out the family dynamics or dysfunctional relationships.

Will contests in the New York Surrogate’s Court, like elsewhere, can be time consuming and costly. Examinations of attesting witnesses, review of the Will execution ceremony and discovery of information reflecting upon the decedent’s capacity can be an excruciating experience for the family members involved. A recent article by Mary Ann Spato appearing in NJ.com on July 26, 2011 recounted the story of author Belva Plain who died last October. It appears that for almost 20 years prior to her death the decedent had fully supported her son, John, based upon an agreement that John would not contact members of the family or claim any part of her estate. Notwithstanding the agreement, after Belva died, John sought to void the agreement and claimed that his mother had been unduly influenced by his sisters. The Court ultimately ruled against John finding that he had no claim against his mother’s estate.

A similar pattern was seen with regard to the estate of the late entertainer James Brown. As reported by Matt Birbeck on July 20, 2011 in RollingStone.com, Brown, who had an estate valued at about $100 million dollars, died in 2006. He left almost his entire estate to a Trust to benefit underpriviledged children in South Carolina and Georgia. However, after a Will contest by his seven children and fourth wife, the estate was split between the family and the Trust. Nevertheless, as reported, none of the estate money has yet to be paid out and there is still an ongoing dispute concerning Brown’s final place of burial.

Another area that has been a source of many Court battles concerns the transfer of a person’s assets prior to their death. Such transfers can destroy even the best estate plan and leave an estate without any assets to be paid to the beneficiaries named in a Last Will. The creation of joint ownership or designating beneficiaries on bank accounts causes these assets to pass to a joint owner or beneficiary automatically upon death, thus insulating them from the control of an estate fiduciary such as an Executor or Administrator. The provisions of a Will or the intestate statutes are essentially avoided. As a Nassau estate attorney, I have seen many instances where children, friends and caretakers rearrange a person’s assets prior to death by having their names added as co-owners or beneficiaries. After the decedent passes on, the Will beneficiaries and estate Executor or Administrator are faced with the arduous task of engaging in litigation to discover and recover the decedent’s assets. Questions of undue influence and intent surround these proceedings and the decedent cannot express his or her actual desires.

July 25, 2011

Manhattan and Other New York Couples Still Face Estate and Other Problems Under the Same-Sex Marriage Law

by Jules M. Haas

Beginning on July 24, 2011 same-sex couples will be allowed to marry in New York. As is common with most new laws, marriage equality provides many new estate and property rights while leaving unanswered other issues.

As is provided throughout New York estate statutes such as the Surrogate’s Court Procedure Act (SCPA) and the Estates, Power and Trusts Law (EPTL), marriage creates a plethora of spousal rights that are quite beneficial. For instance, EPTL section 5-1.1-A provides for a spousal right of election. In essence, the statute seeks to prevent one spouse from disinheriting the other through a Last Will. The statute grants the disinherited spouse certain rights to receive a minimum share of a decedent’s estate.

Similarly, where a person dies intestate without a Last Will EPTL section 4-1.1 provides that the surviving spouse is to receive a share of the estate. Absent the recognition of same-sex marriage, the death of one partner in a same sex relationship left the surviving partner as nothing more than a stranger with regard to estate distribution unless the decedent had actually named the survivor as a beneficiary under a Last Will or other testamentary document such as a revocable trust.

Manhattan probate and administration proceedings, as well as proceedings throughout New York, have been dramatically changed by the new law. Despite these new state entitlements, questions and problems remain, particularly with regard to estate planning and government entitlements. As of now, a federal statute called the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) provides that federal law only recognizes a marriage between a man and a woman. Thus, the same sex marriages that result in the recognition of state-level benefits are ignored for purposes of federal law. As an example, the New York Probate Law Blog has discussed the amendments to the Federal estate tax laws that were enacted in December 2010. Among the changes in the Federal law was a provision that allowed the “portability” or transfer of the unused $5,000,000 estate tax credit between spouses. However, such portability appears not to be available at present to validly married New York same sex couples since they are not considered to be married under Federal law. New York estate planning and estate settlement issues can be very complex given the conflicting application of laws. The same problem arises with the unlimited estate tax marital deduction which would be applied for New York estate tax purposes but not Federal estate tax.

In an article entitled For Love and Money: Inequalities Remain Despite Same-Sex Marriage, written by Allison Arden Besunder published in Law.com on July 1, 2011, many of the “disparities” and conflicts between Federal and New York State laws are discussed.

I represent clients in Surrogate’s Court proceedings and estate tax and property matters. As a New York City estate attorney, it is apparent that clients preparing their Wills and executors administering an estate require an indepth understanding of both Federal and State laws.

July 12, 2011

U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Stern v. Marshall Against Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate

by Jules M. Haas

In Stern v. Marshall, the U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled against the estate of Anna Nicole Smith, who had married a Texas oil tycoon 63 years her senior a year before he died, The New York Times reports.

What this case illustrates is the importance of hiring an experienced New York Probate Lawyer who can sort out any estate planning and trust issues in New York City or elsewhere that need to be finalized to ensure a smooth process for all involved.According to The Times, Smith, a former Playboy playmate and model whose real name was Vickie Lynn Marshall, had once received a bankruptcy court award of more than $400 million and asserted that J. Howard Marshall II’s son had wrongfully interfered with a gift she had expected from his father.

The majority of justices held unconstitutional a provision of the bankruptcy laws that authorized bankruptcy judges to hear some kinds of claims. The case rested on the idea of separation of powers in the context of bankruptcy.

The case illustrates the need to hire an experienced New York Probate Lawyer who is well-versed in New York Probate Law and who can help you sort through this complex area of law. When bankruptcy court is involved, it can be even more difficult to navigate.

Selecting an executor to handle your New York estate or will may be the most important decision you can make in handling your finances. Being an executor of an estate means being responsible for distributing assets as laid out in a will.

While many people would look at this as an honor to be trusted with a person’s assets once they die, it brings with it a great deal of responsibility and dedication. There are legal obligations to being an executor and executors often can use the advise and counsel of a New York Estate Lawyer in how to handle major issues on behalf of an estate.

Wills may be challenged and other problems may arise, so hiring an experienced law firm can help settle these types of issues. Some issues may be handled outside of court and others require court oversight.

Some people think that handling an estate or executing a Will is as simple as contacting family members and doling out cash and family heirlooms, but there is much more. And one of the things that frustrates and mystifies many people are taxes on an estate.

Estate tax issues arise on both the State and Federal level. There are ways to minimize Federal and New York Estate Tax. One way to save is through a “QTIP” trust, which enables surviving spouses to bypass paying estate taxes through the use of a tax credit. Lifetime gifts and charitable contributions are other ways. Trying to do it alone will leave complications for survivors that can turn family members against each other and leave an estate open to unnecessary tax implications. The New York Probate Lawyer Blog has previously discussed the recent changes that were enacted for the Federal Estate tax.

June 14, 2011

Doomsday Profit Gets Inheritance In Queens Woman’s Will

by Jules M. Haas

CNN recently reported about a woman whose aunt gave nearly her entire estate of $300,000 to Family Radio, the non-profit California station that broadcast unsuccessful predictions about the end of the world.

Contested wills in New York probate court can be difficult because they require specific requirements other than a family member feeling slighted by a loved one who passed away. New York Estate and Will Lawyers have handled an untold number of these cases and are well-versed in this area of law. Whether it’s contesting a will or planning an estate, it is a good idea to seek professional guidance.Family Radio’s owner, Harold Camping, has grown to celebrity status in recent months with his predictions that May 21 would mark the return to Earth of Jesus Christ, which would lead to a rapture of believers followed by five months of hell on Earth by non-believers before the world ends. His followers traveled across the country in RVs with large signs plastered on the sides, picketed busy intersections and even purchased billboards in foreign countries proclaiming their predictions. Camping has now said he miscalculated the date, which he now believes is October 21.

As CNN also reported, the non-profit organization is operated largely by donations and brought in $80 million between 2005 and 2009, including $18 million in 2009 alone.

Apparently, $300,000 of these donations came from a Queens woman who died in May 2010. As news of the doomsday prediction made news leading up to May 21, a relative of the woman said she and her sister were each left only $25,000 from her aunt’s estate and the rest went to Family Radio.

While she believes her aunt was comforted by the radio’s discussions about heavenly treasures, she didn’t know it was the same group that was working people into a frenzy about the end of the world. Had her aunt lived to see the prediction fail, the aunt may have had second thoughts and might not have left her money to the organization. While the woman said she wasn’t in need of the money, other family members could have benefited from a larger bequest.

Sometimes family members can successfully challenge whether the loved one had the mental capacity to make the decisions they made in preparing their end-of-life documents. It’s also sometimes possible that executors and others involved in helping a person plan their will can unjustly influence their decisions.

These issues require court action and should only be tackled with an attorney who has the experience necessary to protect your inheritance and the integrity of a loved one’s estate.

May 12, 2011

Large Inheritances Create the Need for Sound Fiscal Planning and Execution in New York

by Jules M. Haas

Imagine the emotion of having a parent or relative die and then deal with the shock of being left a large sum of money as an inheritance. Many would not consider it a burden. However, without the proper plan to handle that kind of change in your life, you could be left mismanaging the money, fighting with siblings and wasting away money your family worked hard to save.

That’s why as previously discussed on New York Probate Lawyer Blog, it is imperative you select a proper executor or trustee in dealing with estate planning. A well-qualified New York Probate Attorney can help plan and manage an estate, including life insurance, stock options and real estate.For example, consider the trouble this Illinois woman had when her mother died of cancer in June 2007. She and her four siblings inherited their parents’ $1 million house, according to CNN Money.

While all siblings agreed to sell the house, it became a hassle because some believed the house was overpriced and others thought it was priced correctly. Eventually, the house sold, though for 9 percent less than their initial estimate. But in the meantime, the siblings had to pay utility bills, landscaping costs and deal with a house that was nearby to no one.

AS CNN Money points out, there are challenges to being a beneficiary. While it is comforting to be remembered and while there is likely a material benefit, there are challenges, including tax laws, family drama and complexity surrounding business dealings.

New York probate law requires court intervention, affidavits, petitions and notice to family members, all of which can be daunting for someone to do on their own. And, if done incorrectly, it can become an ongoing financial burden that relatives never intended it to be.

When dealing with an inheritance or a will, consider how an experienced New York City probate attorney can assist you in either planning your estate or executing the will of a loved one:

Planning your trusts and estates: You should start by taking inventory of your assets and deciding who should execute your will and to whom you want to leave your assets. An attorney is best able to assist you in making and executing a plan.
Choosing an executor: A New York State executor may be appointed when someone leaves assets after death. If you are chosen as an executor, you may need sound legal advice on how best to execute the will.
Dealing with contested wills: In New York, wills can be contested in court. These are often done by heirs who were left little in a will from a relative. There must be a valid legal ground for objecting to a will, but the process can be emotionally and financially exhausting. Consult a probate lawyer who can work to minimize the damage.

April 13, 2011

New York Trusts can Alleviate need for Ancillary Estate to Handle Out-of-State Property

by Jules M. Haas

The NWI Times recently published an article explaining the complexities and expenses associated with ancillary estates, which can be necessary to dispose of real property located in another state.

Proper estate planning in New York can alleviate the need to go through the probate process in multiple states, which can be expensive, time consuming and public. An experienced New York City probate attorney can assist a client in establishing a trust or otherwise working to bypass the probate court process.As we discussed on our New York Probate Lawyer Blog, there are a number of advantages to bypassing the probate court process. One of those is to circumvent the need for ancillary estates. Probate is a state process. And as such, it does not cross state lines. A resident who lives and died in one state, and has real property in another, must enter the probate process in both states. Unless he or she invests in the proper estate planning.

By putting out-of-state property into a trust, you will be able to transfer it upon your death without the need to go through the probate process in either state. The savings of time and money can be quite substantial and you will also enjoy the privacy that comes with property and asset transfers outside probate.

There are a number of issues to consider, not the least of which is taxes. And, in states like Florida where homestead exemptions and property appreciation caps are in place, there may be significant tax implications to making a property transfer.

By planning ahead, you can be assured that your wishes will be carried out at the time of your passing, and that your heirs will not be saddled with unnecessary court proceedings, taxes or estate headaches.

April 11, 2011

Removal of a New York Fiduciary Requires a Strong Demonstration of Wrongdoing

by Jules M. Haas

New York Trusts and Estates attorneys are often asked by clients whether certain circumstances or actions by fiduciaries would require the removal of a fiduciary of the Court. A fiduciary can be an Executor, Preliminary Executor, Trustee, Administrator or Temporary Administrator.

In a typical scenario a beneficiary of an estate may be concerned because the fiduciary has a claim against the decedent’s estate or has received funds from the decedent by gift or through a joint bank account. The estate beneficiary perceives these situations as creating a conflict of interest in Estate Settlement because the fiduciary will not seek to recover funds from gifts or assets transferred to the fiduciary which the beneficiary contends were improper transfers.

Surrogate’s Court Procedure Act (SCPA) Section 711 and Section 719 provide various grounds upon which the Court may suspend, modify or revoke a fiduciary appointment. For example, SCPA Section 711(2) provides for a situation where the fiduciary has “improvidently managed or injured the property committed to his charge or by reason of other misconduct in the execution of his office or dishonesty, druckenness, improvidence or want of understanding, he is unfit for the execution of his office.”

Despite the various instances set forth in the statutes, New York Surrogate’s Courts are very careful and reluctant to remove a fiduciary, such as an Executor, who has been nominated by a decedent. The Court prefers to respect the selection of fiduciaries made by a person in their Last Will or Trust and generally will only remove the fiduciary when the misconduct is egregious or blatant.

Such was the result in a recent decision by Surrogate Nora Anderson, New York Surrogate’s Court, dated April 5, 2011, in Matter of the Application to Revoke Preliminary Letters Testamentary. This case involved the estate of a decedent named Jack E. Maurer. The decedent’s wife sought to remove the preliminary executors who were the decedent’s daughter from a prior marriage and a long-time friend. In refusing to remove the preliminary executors, Surrogate Anderson stated that “Not every breach of fiduciary duty warrants removal. Indeed, even if an executor has a claim against the estate, is involved with litigation against it, is indebted to it, or even has a conflict of interest, such circumstances do not justify removal…Even allegations of wrongdoing against a nominated executor (including conversion and embezzlement), which await judicial determination, are generally insufficient to deprive a nominated executor of the right to receive preliminary letters….”

I have represented both Estate Executors, fiduciaries and beneficiaries in situations where conflicts of interest or alleged acts of misconduct appear. The Surrogate’s Court throughout New York such as Westchester and Bronx are constantly faced with resolving these complicated matters. All parties involved should be represented by an experienced trust and estate attorney.