Last Will

April 15, 2011

Joint Tenancy an Option for Disposing of Real Estate without Probate

We recently reported on our New York Probate Lawyer Blog about the need for ancillary estates to dispose of out-of-state real estate in cases that go through probate court.

Estate planning lawyers in New York City understand there are many options for avoiding probate. In some cases trusts or other options can be a desirable alternative. As part of our ongoing series on Avoiding Probate in New York, we will take a look at the options to transfer real estate.In general, those estates governed by a Last Will (or Intestate estates without a Will) will enter the probate court process. Probate court is a state process however, and as such it typically will not dispose of real estate or other hard assets owned in another state. It can be necessary to enter the probate process in that state as well, unless you own those assets in trust or other arrangements for avoiding probate have been made.

Some states allow automatic transfer of ownership of the property to your chosen heir. You may hold the property in joint ownership. Joint tenancy with right of survivorship will permit your spouse (or chosen heir) to assume ownership and continue living in the house after your passing.

Probate is not avoided if both owners die at the same time and the last surviving owner must make other arrangements to dispose of the property. In some cases, naming a joint tenancy may also trigger gift taxes. And it can create several headaches that can make it a poor choice for an older person who is seeking to transfer ownership after his or passing.

Joint tenancy involving other assets, such as bank accounts, can also create disputes after your death. In cases, for example, where joint tenancy on a bank account is granted to assist with bills, the person may claim those funds automatically, which may not be in keeping with the original intent of the account owner.

Consulting an estate planning lawyer in New York is the best way to make sure your affairs are in order and that your estate passes to your chosen heirs in the manner of your choosing.

April 13, 2011

New York Trusts can Alleviate need for Ancillary Estate to Handle Out-of-State Property

by Jules M. Haas

The NWI Times recently published an article explaining the complexities and expenses associated with ancillary estates, which can be necessary to dispose of real property located in another state.

Proper estate planning in New York can alleviate the need to go through the probate process in multiple states, which can be expensive, time consuming and public. An experienced New York City probate attorney can assist a client in establishing a trust or otherwise working to bypass the probate court process.As we discussed on our New York Probate Lawyer Blog, there are a number of advantages to bypassing the probate court process. One of those is to circumvent the need for ancillary estates. Probate is a state process. And as such, it does not cross state lines. A resident who lives and died in one state, and has real property in another, must enter the probate process in both states. Unless he or she invests in the proper estate planning.

By putting out-of-state property into a trust, you will be able to transfer it upon your death without the need to go through the probate process in either state. The savings of time and money can be quite substantial and you will also enjoy the privacy that comes with property and asset transfers outside probate.

There are a number of issues to consider, not the least of which is taxes. And, in states like Florida where homestead exemptions and property appreciation caps are in place, there may be significant tax implications to making a property transfer.

By planning ahead, you can be assured that your wishes will be carried out at the time of your passing, and that your heirs will not be saddled with unnecessary court proceedings, taxes or estate headaches.

April 6, 2011

New York Probate Procedure Is Affected By Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

by Jules M. Haas

The New York Probate Blog has discussed on many occasions the probate procedure in New York. Probate is the legal process by which a Will is validated by the Surrogate’s Court. The procedure to probate a Will encompasses many facets. Initially, a Probate Petition is prepared and filed with the Court.

The Probate Petition contains basic information regarding the petitioner who is usually the proposed Executor. The Petition is usually prepared with the guidance of an experienced New York Trusts and Estate attorney. Details regarding the decedent, the date of the purported Last Will, the names of the attesting witnesses to the Will and the estimated value of the probate estate are also included. An essential section of the petition requires that the names and addresses of the decedent’s distributees, or next of kin, be provided. The reason for requiring this data is because the distributees have a right to receive official notice of the probate proceeding since they have an interest in contesting the Will. In the event the decedent died without a Will or the purported Last Will is deemed to be invalid, the distributees would inherit the estate according to the laws of intestacy. Therefore, a proper kinship determination is essential to the probate process.

In a recent New York decision, H. Kenneth Ranftle v. Craig Leiby, the New York Appellate Division, First Department, decided on February 25, 2011, that a same-sex Canadian marriage between the decedent and his partner would be recognized by the New York Court. Thus, in this Manhattan Probate case, the decedent’s sole distributee was determined by the Court to be his same-sex “spouse”. The decedent’s siblings were found not to be distributees since the New York Statute, EPTL 4-1.1, gives priority to a spouse. The siblings were precluded from challenging the decedent’s Will.

I have helped many clients prepare probate petitions. Obtaining information regarding distributees and giving them the proper Court mandated notice is a paramount objective. The accurate completion of the probate petition greatly helps speed up a successful Will probate.

March 29, 2011

Baby Boomers to Inherit Trillions, Protect Your Share With New York Estate Planning

by Jules M. Haas

While we talk frequently about the need to plan your estate, rarely do we mention the need to protect an inheritance. Of course, that brings us back to planning your estate!
Baby boomers are about to hit the life lottery, receiving a combined $8.4 trillion, according to Business Insider.

Protecting your inheritance in New York is one of the keys to securing your financial future.New York estate planning lawyers understand how important it is to protect an inheritance. In some cases, it is the first time a client has dealt with a sizable sum of money. In all cases, the goal is to make that money last and, perhaps, pass it on to the next generation.

Forbes reports that baby boomers have already gotten an estimated $2.4 trillion in inheritances. This means that, on average, each inheriting household should be expecting nearly $300,000.

Forbes.com offers baby boomers these pointers to help plan for your future and maintain financial stability:

-Treat your inheritance as a gift passed on. It’s okay, and probably preferred, to become emotionally attached to it. This can help keep you from overspending and splurging.

-Don’t just blow it, and then regret it; think about it carefully.

-Use it to make an emergency fund if you don’t already have one equal to at least six months of necessary funds. It’s recommended that an emergency fund should be kept in safe and liquid investments.

-Pay off credit cards, car loans or your mortgage. Remember, though, to consider the tax angles. Mortgage interest is deductible for taxpayers who itemize. Just make sure these options work in your favor.

-“I encourage people to look at things in one great big bucket. These are assets to serve you. How are you going to invest them to serve you best and to accomplish what you want?” says Myra Salzer, author of the book Living Richly, a guide for inheritors who are living off generous inheritances.

Making an appointment to sit down and talk to an estate planner in New York could be the best money you spend. Tax savings, real estate transfer considerations, and your own plans for the ultimate distribution of your wealth are all issues you should discuss with a professional.

March 25, 2011

New Estate Tax Law Features Portability or Transfer of Exclusion Amount Between Spouses

by Jules M. Haas

Under the new federal estate tax law, the exclusion amount, or the value of an estate that can pass free of federal estate tax, is increased to $5,000,000. This $5,000,000 exemption will end, unless extended or modified by new legislation, on December 31, 2012. One of the most significant changes brought about by the new law with regard to preparing a Last Will or an estate plan, is the portability or transfer of the unused portion of the $5,000,000.00 exclusion between spouses.

In a simple example, say a husband dies in 2011 and leaves his entire $5,000,000 estate to his wife but does not use any part of this $5,000,000 exclusion for estate tax purposes. If the wife then dies in 2012, she can use both her own $5,000,000 exclusion and the $5,000,000 exclusion that was unused by her husband. Thus, the wife can pass on to others a $10,000,000 estate tax free. In the present law, the death of both spouses must occur between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012.

As with all new statutes, particularly involving taxes, novel questions always arise. Suppose a surviving spouse has survived not just one but two (2) predeceased spouses. Could the survivor’s exemption possibly reach $15,000,000 by adding the unused exclusions of both of the two pre-deceased spouses to that of the surviving spouse. The explanation accompanying the law provides that the surviving spouse can only use the exclusion of the last deceased spouse.

In order to utilize the unused exclusion of a deceased spouse, the executor of the first deceased spouse’s estate needs to timely file an estate tax return for the deceased spouse, compute the unused exclusion amount and elect that it can be utilized by the second spouse.

As is true with many aspects of estate settlement and administration, an Executor or estate fiduciary must be aware of his or her options and obligations to secure the maximum benefits for the estate and estate beneficiaries. Preparing and filing estate tax returns is just one of many areas that requires the assistance of a qualified probate lawyer.

March 23, 2011

New York Estate Planning can Reduce Couple’s Tax Exposure

by Jules M. Haas

Market Watch recently published some estate tax tips for married couples. New York City estate planning attorneys have been dealing with the changes to the estate tax and gift tax limits since they were implemented late last year.

As we reported in December on our New York Probate Lawyer Blog, Congress set the estate tax exclusion at $5 million and the lifetime gift-tax limit at $5 million. The tax exemption ends at the end of 2012. But for now, couples enjoy tax-free giving power and the vast majority of the nation’s estates may pass to heirs tax free.Unlimited Marital Deduction: For spouses who are U.S. citizens, there is no limit to the tax-free inheritance they can receive. However, it does not negate the need for estate planning in New York: Leaving your spouse a large estate could mean that he or she exceeds the limits, which would subject the estate to excessive taxation upon his or her death.

Portable Estate Tax Exemption: This year and next (2011 and 2012), you may direct the executor of your estate to leave any unused federal estate tax exemption to your surviving spouse. This includes your $5 million exemption and means a spouse could have a $10 million exemption for estates distributed this year or next. Unless Congress acts, these portable exemptions are set to expire at the end of next year.

Donate to IRS-Approved Charities: Giving to IRS-approved charities as part of a comprehensive estate plan is a great way to get your estate down to the $5 million estate-tax cap — or $10 million for couples with both available exemptions.

Give Gifts to Relatives: The annual gift-tax exclusion is $13,000, which can be given without reducing your lifetime $5 million federal gift-tax exemption. If you had two children and four grandchildren, you and your spouse could each give $13,000 to each one, or $156,000 tax free for 2011. You could do the same thing next year and reduce your taxable estate by $312,0000.

Pay School Expenses or Medical Bills for Relatives: Aside from room and board, you can give unlimited amounts for these purposes,without reducing your gift-tax or estate-tax exemption. Payments must be made directly to the school or medical provider.

Give Away Appreciating Assets: Use your $5 million gift-tax limit to give away appreciating assets now — while they are worth less than they will be at the time of your passing.

Use an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust: While life insurance proceeds are usually income-tax free, they are included in your estate for estate-tax purposes. Policies held in irrevocable trust are free from estate-tax exposure. This is particularly critical for single people — married people can pass the proceeds to a spouse tax free using the marital deduction privilege (though they may then face taxation upon the death of a spouse). Such trusts are a terrific way to cover estate taxes upon your death.

March 22, 2011

Transfer-on-Death Registration One Option for Planning New York Estate

by Jules M. Haas

As part of our ongoing series on the advantages and disadvantages of avoiding probate in New York, our New York City estate planning attorney publishes this post on naming beneficiaries for stocks and bonds.

Most recently we discussed on our New York Probate Lawyer Blog the importance of naming beneficiaries to retirement accounts. Unfortunately, it not unusual for complications to arise — including instances where the name of an ex-spouse is left on an account — particularly in cases of sudden death during middle age.Avoiding probate has its advantages — as we have discussed, keeping an estate settlement out of court can speed the process and keep it private. Whereas, a probated estate will be subjected to the court’s time frame and the public process inherent in most court cases. However, avoiding probate does not mean you will not need a probate attorney; indeed, an estate planning lawyer may be even more critical in cases where a person desires to structure an estate capable of bypassing the safeguards of the court process.

Like naming beneficiaries on retirement accounts, naming beneficiaries of stocks and bonds is another simple way to transfer assets outside of probate court. The advent of IRAs, 401(k) plans and self-directed brokerage accounts has given rise to laws in 48 states (Louisiana and Texas are the laggards) that deal with transfer-on-death registration. Much like the payable-on-death bank accounts we previously discussed, transfer-on-death registration permits you to own stocks in what is known as “beneficiary form,” which permits their transfer to a named beneficiary at the time of your death.

One potential drawback is that your broker may not permit you to name an alternate beneficiary. In other cases, your broker may not offer the service. Joint stock accounts can have T.O.D. benefits but the co-owner must have rights of survivorship. What that means is that the account will not transfer to the named beneficiary until both account holders are deceased.

There are also rights of spouses under state law, which cannot be bypassed using T.O.D. And complications apply to naming a child under 18 as beneficiary — a guardian and an adult money manager may be needed to be appointed to make sure a minor has sufficient assistance in managing the funds.

In cases where a beneficiary dies before you do, or there is otherwise an absence of named beneficiary, the stocks would typically be distributed under your Will’s “residuary clause,” which names a beneficiary to inherit everything not specifically mentioned in the Will.

Other challenges exist in using T.O.D. registration. And your estate planner is best suited to assist you in determining whether such a transfer is right for you. Instances in which a bond is not easily divisible, or the need exists to name more than one beneficiary, are examples of instances where other arrangements may best serve an estate.

March 10, 2011

Undue Influence In Changing Life Insurance Beneficiary Can Be Difficult to Prove

by Jules M. Haas

The New York Probate Lawyer Blog has previously discussed the naming of a beneficiary on a life insurance policy or other asset such as a pension or retirement account. Upon a person’s death, these assets are paid directly to the named beneficiary (assuming the beneficiary is surviving) and are not part of the probate or intestate administration.

It is of utmost importance that the beneficiary designation clause be completed properly and clearly so that the intended beneficiary can receive the asset proceeds following a death. These designations should be well thought out as part of an overall estate plan.

Unfortunately, controversy and Court litigation often arises when beneficiary selections are changed while a person is elderly, or experiencing medical problems or when the change occurs shortly before death. Such changes are particularly dramatic when the new beneficiary is a person who has not been involved in the decedent’s life until recently such as a new friend, spouse or health aide. The initial reaction to such change, particularly from the now disinherited beneficiary – such as a child, long-time friend or other seemingly natural beneficiary selection – is that the change could only be the result of some kind of undue influence perpetrated upon the decedent at a time when he or she was vulnerable, weakened due to illness or old age or incapacitated.

However, despite the ready appearance of wrongdoing, actually demonstrating that the decedent did not intend the change and that the new designation should be voided is not an easy task. Such was the situation in a recent case entitled Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Felecia Bradway, decided in the Federal District Court, Southern District of New York, 10 Civ. 0254. As reported in the New York Law Journal by Mark Hamblett on February 28, 2011, the decedent, Bradway, had designated his daughter as the beneficiary of a $300,000 life insurance policy in 1998. However, in May, 2008 Bradway changed the beneficiary designation to a co-worker whom he married later that year. Bradway had been taking a narcotic pain medication and was diagnosed with liver cancer shortly before his wedding. Bradway then died in March 2009.

The disinherited daughter claimed that the new spouse, “who was 30 years younger than Mr. Bradway, influenced him by proposing marriage while he was ‘terminally ill’ , by attempting to isolate him from his family following his cancer diagnosis and by failing to provide him with proper medical care after the diagnosis.”

As reported in the article, notwithstanding the daughter’s allegations, the Court found that “there was not enough evidence for a ‘reasonable finder of fact’ to show Mr. Bradway’s mind was subverted when he made the May 27, 2008 designation of beneficiary.”

The Bradway case demonstrates that it is important to make clear beneficiary designations as part of an estate plan. Probate, Guardianship, and other Court proceedings provide avenues to attack designations that may seem particularly improper under the circumstances. Such attacks however, require the proper presentation of proof to succeed.

March 7, 2011

The New York Probate Process Involves Numerous Documents

by Jules M. Haas

The Probate of a Last Will in New York can appear to be a complicated and mysterious procedure. While the rules and procedures of the Surrogate’s Court are complex, certain fundamental requirements for Probate are fairly easy to set forth.

Among the essential aspects to a Probate proceeding is providing the parties interested in the proceeding with proper notice that the Court case has been commenced. In particular, the decedent’s “distributees” or closest next of kin are required to be served with a “Citation”. A “Citation” is like a summons in a regular civil action. The Citation will advise the parties who receive it as to the Court date and that they need to appear if they desire to object to the Probate of the Will. The necessity of having to serve a Citation and wait for a Court date, which may not be scheduled for a month or more after the Will is filed with the Court, results in a delay in the administration of the decedent’s estate.

In most estates where close family members, such as spouse or children, have no objection to the Probate of the Will, a form entitled “Waiver of Issuance and Service of Process and Consent to Probate” can be signed by the interested party. This form once signed and notarized, dispenses with the need to serve a Citation on such person. In fact, if all the necessary parties sign such a form, there is no need to serve a Citation at all and the Probate process and estate administration can be expedited.

Surrogate’s Court Procedure Act Section 401(4) provides, in part, that the Waiver Form “shall state the date of the will to which it relates and that a copy has been furnished or examined.”

In most instances when a client has requested that I represent them in Probate proceedings, efforts are made to obtain signed Waiver forms from all necessary parties as quickly as possible. While there are many aspects to and requirements for Probate, obtaining Waivers is always a first essential step, where possible.

March 2, 2011

New York Article 81 Guardians Are Bound By The Court To Act Properly

by Jules M. Haas

The New York Probate Lawyer Blog has discussed the powers and obligations of a property management and personal needs Guardian. When a person is found to be incapacitated and a Guardian is appointed, the Court maintains scrutiny over the actions of the Guardian.

One of the safeguards provided by Article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law (MHL) is that the Court may require the posting of a bond (MHL Sec. 81.25). A bond is essentially an insurance policy issued by a surety company that insures payment to creditors and others entitled to receive the incapacitated person’s funds in the event the Guardian misappropriates those funds. The Court will set the amount of the bond based upon the value of and income from the assets of the incapacitated person. Since the Court appointed Guardian must qualify for the bond, the surety will check the Guardian’s credit and financial history. A poor credit history may result in the denial of a bond and, thereby, prevent a person from qualifying as a Guardian.

It is a good practice, which I follow, to have the bonding company review a client’s credit before he or she files a petition for appointment as a Guardian so that we can be certain the client can qualify if appointed.

Another safeguard provided by the law is contained in MHL Section 81.31 which requires that the Guardian file an Annual Report with the Court every May. The Annual Report contains information concerning the Guardianship financial transactions that occurred during the prior year along with information regarding the incapacitated person’s physical and mental condition. This information is typically reviewed by a Court Examiner. In the event the Court Examiner finds information that shows improper conduct on the part of the Guardian, the findings will be reported to the Court.

A recent case where a Guardian’s actions were found to be improper was reported by Daniel Wise in the New York Law Journal on January 6, 2011. The Article entitled Guardian Must Return Funds Paid to Family For Ward’s Care, described a case where a lawyer-guardian was required by the Court to repay to the incapacitated person’s estate over $100,000.00 that the Guardian had paid to a company that provided care to the Incapacitated Person. It was found that the company was controlled by the Guardian’s spouse. Judge Charles J. Thomas also ruled that the Guardian had to forfeit commissions and legal fees.

Guardians are required to be diligent in the performance of their duties. Both Guardians and the families of the Incapacitated Person often require legal representation to fully understand and protect their interests.